Minister not in favour of ferry legislation

By Richard Wright

Tuesday, March 5, 2013

 

A GOVERNMENT minister has today (Tuesday) told an Isle of Wight delegation, led by MP Andrew Turner, that he is not in favour of regulating cross-Solent travel through legislation.

Transport minister Stephen Hammond, who is responsible for maritime affairs, said he instead favoured "soft touch" regulation — guiding the ferry firms over services and prices.

He told Isle of Wight Council representatives in the delegation that there was funding available for transport initiatives and urged them to investigate sources. He also promised to meet with Wightlink.

The delegation also included representatives of the Isle of Wight Trades Union Council (IW TUC) and the founder of the Solent Ferry Users’ Group (SFUG), Julia Bridgeman.

She said: "The minister was concerned about the lack of consultation from Wightlink over the introduction of its cuts in services which have had such a big effect on the Island.

"The meeting, at the Department of Transport in London, included representatives of the Island Trades Union Council and, despite it being quite short, I think we were able to put across all the points that have been made on the Island.

"I believe there is now some serious momentum behind our concerns about reduced timetabling, the security of the link, the cost of services and the effect on the Island’s economy."

Mr Turner said: "It was worthwhile meeting the minister. It is always powerful when ministers realise that political parties are prepared to put their differences aside and work together because an issue such as this is so important to the community."

On Thursday, next week, ferry companies, secretary of state for transport Patrick McLoughlin and Island politicians will meet to discuss cross-Solent travel.

IW TUC spokesman Steve Butler said they would take on board the government's position, but they would not let them bury the issue, which they would continue to fight.

Reporter: richardw@iwcpmail.co.uk

Comments

Log-in or register to comment on this story.

By ticking "Remember me" you agree to a cookie being stored on your computer - no personal data is shared.

Forgotten your password?
Displaying the last 10 of 37 comments - Show All Comments

Log-in to Report

by Richard Robinson

14th March 2013, at 09:13:43

It is time for the IoW Council to support the Islanders and make landing point available where a bridge and/or tunnel can be constructed on the Island. Support a petition to stop hard earned UK money being exported to foreign shores without the benefit of tax and providing a mechanism to gain access to the mainland without being held to ransom. This crossing is an essential service and should be recognized as such. WightLink continually abuse their position of strength, but if there is a clear demand for a fixed link, the finances can be arranged with the necessary support.

Log-in to Report

by neil jacks

7th March 2013, at 09:45:13

Steve, they certainly wont appreciate the problems it will bring but at least they will be able to tell their children of an Isle of wight that used to have a low crime rate, not be overcrowded and was once a beautiful place of rolling hills and meadows. They will be able to tell them how those who wanted it built thought it would bring increased prosperity, instead it bought down local companies. They will be able to tell how the culture shift spoiled the way of life on the Island enjoyed for generations but was never really appreciated until it was gone.

Log-in to Report

by Steve Smith

6th March 2013, at 22:45:31

So Mr Crowe,
"Never mind, even these people will appreciate its presence when built :-)"
As neither you nor I will ever see this bridge/fixed link, can you honestly say that your grandchildren or even great-grandchildren will?

Log-in to Report

by Stephen Elliott

6th March 2013, at 22:35:34

So basically nothing happened

Log-in to Report

by neil jacks

6th March 2013, at 20:50:23

Mike,I assure you it was neither.
Never mind

Log-in to Report

by Mr Justice

6th March 2013, at 18:54:50

I seem to recall some chap starting a fixed link group some ten or so years ago? Someone should do the same now as much has changed. I would certainly join it. A feasibility study, train, road, bridge or tunnel could be the first step. The Island is dying a long slow death.

Log-in to Report

by Mike Crowe

6th March 2013, at 18:44:27

Paul Reubens?

Sorry, over my head. No doubt either rude or trying to be funny.

Never mind.
.

Log-in to Report

by neil jacks

6th March 2013, at 18:24:23

Thanks for the info, very interesting, however, thats some time ago and the world don't tick like that anymore.

Mike I think Paul Reubens has got your postings covered.

Log-in to Report

by K Thornton

6th March 2013, at 13:28:45

correction for info - http://www.iwbeacon.com/beacon/isle-of-wight/local-news/articles/the-islands-almost-fixed-link-the-island-story

Log-in to Report

by K Thornton

6th March 2013, at 13:22:04

Neil - I think you will find that a fixed link via rail was already approved and indeed under construction prior to the outbreak of World War 1. Finance was in place and construction started and was then halted due to the need to fund the War effort. Had it not been for this we would have the link already. Info on this is listed on the Wikipedia site.

Any views or opinions presented in the comments above are solely those of the author and do not represent those of the Isle of Wight County Press.

Facebook Icon Twitter Icon Delicious Icon

More News

1 - 2 - 3 - 4

Most Read

  1. Homes plan in top hotel’s grounds

    Saturday, May 18, 2013

  2. Down the hatch

    Sunday, May 19, 2013

  3. Hundreds turn out for Race for Life

    Sunday, May 19, 2013

  4. New way of receiving prescriptions

    Saturday, May 18, 2013

  5. Island urged to help save disappearing bee

    Saturday, May 18, 2013